Inter-rater reliability of surgical reviews for AREN03B2: a COG renal tumor committee study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
PURPOSE The Children's Oncology Group (COG) renal tumor study (AREN03B2) requires real-time central review of radiology, pathology, and the surgical procedure to determine appropriate risk-based therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the surgical reviews. METHODS Of the first 3200 enrolled AREN03B2 patients, a sample of 100 enriched for blood vessel involvement, spill, rupture, and lymph node involvement was selected for analysis. The surgical assessment was then performed independently by two blinded surgical reviewers and compared to the original assessment, which had been completed by another of the committee surgeons. Variables assessed included surgeon-determined local tumor stage, overall disease stage, type of renal procedure performed, presence of tumor rupture, occurrence of intraoperative tumor spill, blood vessel involvement, presence of peritoneal implants, and interpretation of residual disease. Inter-rater reliability was measured using the Fleiss' Kappa statistic two-sided hypothesis tests (Kappa, p-value). RESULTS Local tumor stage correlated in all 3 reviews except in one case (Kappa=0.9775, p<0.001). Similarly, overall disease stage had excellent correlation (0.9422, p<0.001). There was strong correlation for type of renal procedure (0.8357, p<0.001), presence of tumor rupture (0.6858, p<0.001), intraoperative tumor spill (0.6493, p<0.001), and blood vessel involvement (0.6470, p<0.001). Variables that had lower correlation were determination of the presence of peritoneal implants (0.2753, p<0.001) and interpretation of residual disease status (0.5310, p<0.001). CONCLUSION The inter-rater reliability of the surgical review is high based on the great consistency in the 3 independent review results. This analysis provides validation and establishes precedent for real-time central surgical review to determine treatment assignment in a risk-based stratagem for multimodal cancer therapy.
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of Spasticity Using the Ashworth Scale with Intermediate Scores (ASIS)
Objectives: The main purpose of this research was to study and contribute to an accurate test of spastic limb. The intra, inter rater reliability of the test was examined. Methods: The present study was carried out in two parts In the first part of the study, the modified Ashworth Scale with Intermediate Scores (ASIS) was studied. During the second part of the study the intra, inter rater re...
متن کاملTest-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability Study of the Schedule for Oral-Motor Assessment in Persian Children
Objectives: Reliable and valid clinical tools to screen, diagnose, and describe eating functions and dysphagia in children are highly warranted. Today most specialists are aware of the role of assessment scales in the treatment of affected individuals. However, the problem is that the clinical tools used might be nonstandard, and worldwide, there is no integrated assessment performed to assess ...
متن کاملDesigning, Fabricating, and Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Digital Headband for Cervical Proprioception Assessment: A Descriptive Study
Background and Objectives: Accuracy of proprioceptive input plays an important role in cervical motor control. Several methods have been used to evaluate the accuracy of proprioceptive input as a factor of cervical injury prevention or rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to introduce a new tool for evaluating the accuracy of cervical proprioception and determine its validity and reliabili...
متن کاملFunctional Movement Screen in Elite Boy Basketball Players: A Reliability Study
Purpose: To investigate the reliability of Functional Movement Screen (FMS) in basketball players. A few studies have compared the reliability of FMS between raters with different experience in athletes. The purpose of this study was to compare the FMS scoring between the beginners and expert raters using video records. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The study subjects compris...
متن کاملInter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
BACKGROUND Inter-rater reliability (IRR) is mainly assessed based on only two reviewers of unknown expertise. The aim of this paper is to examine differences in the IRR of the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and R(evised)-AMSTAR depending on the pair of reviewers. METHODS Five reviewers independently applied AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR to 16 systematic reviews (eight Cochrane revie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of pediatric surgery
دوره 49 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014